A constructura is convicted to pay the costs that a buyer had to assume for not be replacing to the mortgage that had the signed property development company and having signed it with another entity
07.04.2006
The judgment published by Ausbanc, considers to be excessive the clause of a contract of sale that forced the claimants to finance the cancellation of the mortgage, the expenses register them and notarial, for choosing an entity that was offering better conditions.
On the other hand, close to half of the buyers of housing who request a mortgage they need a financing over 100 % of the cost of that one. Four years ago, this percentage was located in 28 %. This way - there becomes detached a study of the Union of Real estate Credits (UCI), which it indicates that the average of required financing is 92,9 % opposite to 87,3 % four-year ago-old. Nevertheless, the percentage of clients who needs financing is, with 76,97 % practically identical to the observed one in the previous study.
Source: cincodias.com
Comments
Something on that to comment?
